Last night I was thrilled to check my message inbox on kickstarter to find they had approved the project!
And thanks to my brooklynite friend Lee, who intrested me in Kickstarter in December. And, thanks to my wife Amy who did editing kung fu on my proposal while caring for our little daughter at the same time!
I'm super excited to switch into a higher gear as the project goes live, around next week sometime. I'm working on the video and doing sketch sessions for the mini book and top level incentives right now. The sun is out and my shop is humming with pre-production.
On NPR today I heard a piece about the Environmental Protection Agency and the future-looking new head of the department. He said that he sees a future where the EPA is less and less needed because humans will have learned how to use non toxic chemicals and chemicals mimicking natural compounds. He's even going so far as pushing for EPA's own scientists to come up with their own chemistry solutions to our cess pool of a system.
This got me relating this approach to education. What if teacher's were incentivised to take educational solutions into their own hands?
I take a further look at this approach. I think teachers, along with open source communities, co-op business through the lens of the internet, we can take educational solutions into our own hands. This approach gives me great hope. In the last 6 years, I have been routinely stupified by the beauracracy that runs our education system. To top it off, I am now seeing that the way we train teachers to work in our schools has it's own set of problems, disjointed from the education system itself.
I am going to become a credentialed teacher. That is, a publicly accepted member of the teaching community(I think I already am). I just think it is going to be in a whole new way than any solutions either bureaucracy-ladened system can dish up to save how we educate our youth.
thinking about the approach to developing the hands-on classroom development, I have been dwelling on the problem of how teachers will train for industrial and career/tech classrooms. The student demand is there, but even if most of the administrators wanted to open more "shop classes", there is a shortage of teachers properly trained to be safe and effective in a shop setting.
When the boomers leave public school shops, we need to take action now to capture the vast wealth of information and know-how these teachers are hard pressed to pass on for lack of administative support, and teacher training programs suitable for shop teachers to take their places.
It's a tough problem from any angle, but today I struck me that a good starting place for developing these shops is not at first building student demand, finding administrative support, or training teachers properly. It struck me that even if the perfect storm of all of these came together, the state of most public school shops is less that state of the art. In a lot of cases they are pretty dangerous places, with tons of old, out of tune, tools and machines. But it's nothing that can't be fixed and maintained.
I was not one of the millions who watched Obamas state of the union last night, but I did readthe state of the union soon afterwards. It was inspiring, but some of the policy insight was depressingly conventional. Instead of bitching, I'll offer some of my thoughts on redeveloping our nation. I like to focuss on my local situation, and how I can make the deepest impact, while remaining local and small. as I develop my business ideas and aspirations, I keep this in mind.
When redeveloping a house, a new community focus must be kept in mind. Development for walking to services and work. Development for inter-generational living. development with passive solar planning. development for education to mix with community surrounding school campuses. develop a new systems relationship between education and industry. development for locally sourced and built goods/fixing services. Development for terrestrial wireless gateway technology in the building system of each redeveloped structure.
This last one is something I want to focus on explaining a little more. It has been hiding out in the recesses of my brain for a while and it needs some attention.
Trying to get some TPA work done and it just keeps getting worse. The 3rd and 4th case study are about special needs students, adaptation, and modification.
What's messed up is that if I were to submit these with out having someone edit and review them, there is pretty much no chance I would ever pass these things. This is the worst area for me. I'm not a stellar writter to begin with, then I have to regurgitate textbook information, which is not exactly me forte either. I'm beginning to wonder if there is a modification for teacher-candidates(basically students) who have "learning disabilities", because I'm horribly disabled for these damn things.
Why isn't the teacher credentialing process rooted in the classroom. I can teach students how to build things and use machines. I would need some coaching to learn how to deal with all of the special needs in the classroom. This is a shining example where the teacher training methods need some help.